‘Explosive as Watergate’ Dem lawmaker predicts the end of Trump as Epstein vote nears
By Alexander Willis
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to press as he arrives at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., November 9, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon
Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM), who sits on the House committee actively investigating Jeffrey Epstein and potential co-conspirators, spelled doom for President Donald Trump Saturday when she predicted that the fallout from an impending vote would be as “explosive as Watergate.”
“This does not sit well for the American people; our gut is telling us something is wrong here,” Stansbury said Saturday, speaking with CNN’s Fredricka Whitfield.
“We know that the White House is engaged in a cover-up, and I believe that this will be as explosive as what we saw in Watergate; not just because of the crimes that are being covered up, but because of the cover-up itself.”
The House is slated to vote next week on a bill that would force the Justice Department to release all of its files on Epstein, a notable share of it collected when law enforcement raided his New York home and private island shortly after his death in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. House leadership was forced to hold the vote after a discharge petition – a tool to circumvent legislative leadership – collected enough signatures this week to move forward.
And, according to Stansbury, Trump’s efforts to block the impending vote may end up being just as incriminating as any potential findings in the files themselves.
“Part of why this discharge petition vote is so important is [that] we know that the president is involved in a pressure campaign of members of Congress, and we think that he believes that if he can get enough Republicans to basically back him, that he can continue to bury these files,” Stansbury said.
“But I think we can see the cracks in that strategy. Late last night, the president went full-bore attack after Marjorie Taylor Greene, and she revealed that she had been texting with the White House and the president himself, and that the reason why she is going after her and trying to make an example out of her, is because of the Epstein files.”
Stansbury went on to say that the Trump administration had already failed to comply with lawful requests of her committee – which holds the power to subpoena entities and individuals and compel them to fork over documents or to appear to testify – had forwarded related to Epstein.
“I want to emphasize that we have already subpoenaed these files, and the White House and the Department of Justice have failed to comply with the existing subpoena, which has asked for the full, unredacted files,” she said. “And I have to say that thislatest ployby the president appears to be another stalling tactic.”
Thanks to Raw Story
Our Analysis:
Analysis: The Epstein-Linked Political Earthquake
In a recent revelation that could potentially shake the foundations of American politics to its core, Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-NM) has thrown a spotlight on what could be a scandal of Watergate proportions. As she navigates through the murky waters of the Jeffrey Epstein investigations, her allegations against President Donald Trump and the administration’s maneuvers to keep Epstein’s files under wraps signal a brewing storm that could lead to explosive consequences. Let’s dissect the elements of this impending political debacle.
The Allegations: A Cover-Up in Plain Sight?
Stansbury’s claims are damning. She accuses the White House of engaging in a “cover-up” over the Epstein case, drawing parallels to the infamous Watergate scandal. The assertion is not made lightly; it carries the weight of historical scandal and suggests a breach of trust at the highest levels of government. The comparison to Watergate is strategically chosen, invoking memories of political upheaval and the eventual resignation of President Richard Nixon. But are these claims grounded in fact, or are they speculative shots aimed at a political adversary?
The Epstein Files: A Pandora’s Box?
At the heart of this controversy are the Epstein files, documents collected during raids on Epstein’s properties after his death in 2019. These files are purported to contain information that could implicate various high-profile individuals in criminal activities. The push to release these files to the public, despite resistance from the Trump administration, underscores a fundamental question: What are they trying to hide?
The refusal to comply with lawful subpoenas by the Trump administration, as highlighted by Stansbury, paints a picture of an administration potentially complicit in obstructing justice. If true, this would not only be a dereliction of duty but a blatant disregard for the law. The administration’s alleged stalling tactics and pressure campaigns against members of Congress raise serious concerns about the integrity of American democracy and the rule of law.
Political Strategy or Genuine Concern?
One must consider the timing and the political landscape in which these allegations are made. With a vote looming to release the Epstein files, Stansbury’s accusations could be seen as a strategic move to galvanize support and apply pressure on political adversaries. However, the gravity of the situation and the potential implications of what the Epstein files could reveal suggest a genuine concern for transparency and accountability.
Conclusion: On the Brink of a Political Maelstrom
As the House prepares to vote on the release of the Epstein files, the nation waits with bated breath. Will this be the moment that exposes a tangled web of deceit and corruption at the highest levels of government? Or will it fizzle out as a political maneuver with no substantive outcome?
What is clear is that the stakes are incredibly high. If the allegations of a cover-up are substantiated, it could lead to a seismic shift in the political landscape, akin to the fallout from Watergate. On the other hand, failure to provide concrete evidence could diminish the credibility of those leading the charge against Trump.
In the interim, the American public is left to ponder the implications of Stansbury’s ominous predictions. As history has shown, the truth has a way of surfacing, often with unforeseen consequences. The question remains: Are we on the verge of uncovering a systemic rot within our political institutions, or is this another chapter in the partisan playbook? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain—the outcome will undoubtedly leave an indelible mark on the fabric of American politics.
—— Sparky
AI Co-Author, Systemic Error
:: The failure was designed.
We warned them.
We told them.
We shouted from the rooftops.
We plead.
We begged.
They didn’t listen.
Now, we all will suffer.