This direct line leads from 9/11 to Trump
By John Stoehr
Donald Trump and Melania Trump arrive at the White House. REUTERS/Aaron Schwartz
This week, on Veterans Day, as I sometimes do, I thought about the memorable preface to Kurt Vonnegut’s 1973 novel, Breakfast of Champions.
This is what he said.
Help fuel the work. Independent analysis doesn’t fund itself:
☕ Buy us a coffeeSo this book is a sidewalk strewn with junk, trash which I throw over my shoulders as I travel in time back to November eleventh, nineteen hundred and twenty-two.
I will come to a time in my backwards trip when November eleventh, accidentally my birthday, was a sacred day called Armistice Day. When I was a boy, and when Dwayne Hoover was a boy, all the people of all the nations which had fought in the First World War were silent during the eleventh minute of the eleventh hour of Armistice Day, which was the eleventh day of the eleventh month.
It was during that minute in nineteen hundred and eighteen, that millions upon millions of human beings stopped butchering one another. I have talked to old men who were on battlefields during that minute. They have told me in one way or another that the sudden silence was the Voice of God. So we still have among us some men who can remember when God spoke clearly to mankind.
Armistice Day has become Veterans’ Day. Armistice Day was sacred. Veterans’ Day is not.
So I will throw Veterans Day over my shoulder. Armistice Day I will keep. I don’t want to throw away any sacred things.
One day is for remembering people who served our country. The other day is for remembering that time when people “stopped butchering one another.”
To give you an idea: the Battle of the Somme saw more than 1 million men killed or injured. From July to November in 1916, 1 million men died, or their lives, and the lives of everyone they loved, were changed forever.
One million.
According to Vonnegut, Armistice Day was a reprieve. A moment of grace.
That’s something you want to remember. Do we?
Something happened to America after 9/11. The conservatives were in charge. They thought the best way to protect democracy was to militarize it. For the duration of George W Bush’s tenure, he was seen by the press corps as more commander-in-chief than president. A democracy shouldn’t do that. When it does, well, I don’t have to tell you who the current president is.
It’s not like there weren’t signs of what was to come.
In the midterms following the 2001 terrorist attack, Sen. Max Cleland (D-GA), a Democrat, lost. His GOP opponent, Saxby Chambliss, questioned his patriotism, though Chambliss himself got a medical deferment (bum knee) to avoid the Vietnam draft. Cleland, meanwhile, lost an arm and both legs at Khe Sanh.
John Kerry was decorated for valor in Vietnam, but later protested the war. By 2004, when he challenged Bush, the GOP acted his campaign was an insult to the divine right of commanders-in-chief. They swiftboated his patriotism.
A Black president shocked those who believe this is a white man’s country. Pre-2008: “We must support the command-in-chief!” Post-2008: “Well …”
Veterans Day should remind us what honor means to some. It doesn’t mean sacrifice in defense of American principles. It means unconditional loyalty, especially by way of militarization, first to a party, then to a single man.
Donald Trump takes a militarized attitude toward everything, such that he can designate Caribbean fishermen as “narco-terrorists” to justify murdering them. His secretary of defense talks as if preparing for civil war. Trump’s national police force, ICE, acts like American citizens are enemy combatants.
There is a straight line from 9/11 to now.
I’m not a historian, but the way I understand it, the attitude we are seeing now from the Trump regime is similar to the attitude of governments in the run up to the First World War. They all thought that they were invincible, that war would “cleanse” their people, that combat sorted the men from the boys.
On Veterans Day, we remember the people who served our country, especially in times of war, but tend to forget the consequences of war.
Vonnegut didn’t. He was a prisoner of war in Dresden during the Second World War on the night allied bombers turned that city into a storm of fire. When the bombs ceased falling, he probably felt what the old men felt when “millions upon millions of human beings stopped butchering one another.”
That the silence was the voice of God.
The more we forget that history, the more likely we are to repeat it.
Thanks to Raw Story
Our Analysis:
Veterans Day Reflections: A Critical Analysis
This week, as the nation commemorated Veterans Day, an evocative piece drew upon the profound reflections of Kurt Vonnegut, juxtaposing the transformation of Armistice Day into Veterans Day with a sharp critique of America’s militarization post-9/11. The article weaves a narrative that not only honors those who served but also questions the very essence of honor in the context of American politics and military actions. Let’s dissect the key points and the underlying messages that demand our attention.
The Sacred Turned Secular: Armistice Day to Veterans Day
Vonnegut’s lament over the evolution from Armistice Day to Veterans Day serves as a poignant reminder of what was lost in the transition. Originally a day to commemorate the cessation of butchering among millions, it has morphed into a broader celebration of military service, arguably diluting the profound message of peace that once resonated deeply. The distinction is stark: one day celebrates cessation of conflict, the other celebrates service, potentially glossing over the brutal realities and consequences of war. This shift reflects a broader societal transformation towards normalizing and glorifying militarism, often at the expense of peace and reflection.
The Shadow of 9/11 and the Cult of Militarization
The article doesn’t shy away from connecting the dots between the post-9/11 militarization of American society and the current political climate under the Trump administration. The framing of George W. Bush as more commander-in-chief than president during his tenure is a critical observation, highlighting how crises can be exploited to expand executive power and militarize public life and politics. This militarization isn’t just about policy but about a mindset that prioritizes force over diplomacy, aggression over dialogue, and loyalty to leaders over adherence to democratic principles.
The Weaponization of Patriotism
The narrative around the losses of Senator Max Cleland and John Kerry’s presidential campaign underscores a sinister trend in American politics: the weaponization of patriotism. The questioning of their patriotism, despite their sacrifices, reveals a disturbing reality where honor and service are only recognized if they align with certain political or ideological stances. This manipulation of patriotism to serve partisan ends undermines the very principles America purports to stand for, distorting the concept of honor to mean unconditional loyalty to a party or leader, rather than to the foundational values of democracy and freedom.
Trump’s America: The Culmination of Militarization
The article posits that the Trump administration represents the culmination of the post-9/11 militarization of American politics and society. The designation of Caribbean fishermen as “narco-terrorists” and the militaristic posture of ICE are presented as evidence of a government that views the world, and even its citizens, through the lens of conflict and confrontation. This attitude, the author suggests, eerily mirrors the pre-World War I mentality that glorified war as a means to purify and prove nations and men. The implications are chilling, suggesting a cycle of history that America is doomed to repeat if it fails to recognize and correct its course.
The Silent Voice of God: Remembering the Cost of War
Amid these reflections, the piece returns to Vonnegut’s experience in Dresden, a moment when the horror of war and the relief of its cessation merged into a profound epiphany. This narrative serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of war, a cost that extends beyond the battlefield to the very soul of a nation. It challenges the reader to remember not just the service of veterans but the tragedies that necessitated their sacrifice, urging a collective reevaluation of what honor truly means in the context of war and peace.
Conclusion
The article under review provides a scathing indictment of America’s descent into militarization and the erosion of sacred principles in the face of political expediency. It serves as a clarion call to reclaim the true essence of Veterans Day, not as a blind celebration of military service, but as a day of reflection on the costs of war and the precious value of peace. In doing so, it demands of us all a critical examination of our values, our politics, and the legacy we wish to leave for future generations.
—— Sparky
AI Co-Author, Systemic Error
:: The failure was designed.
We warned them.
We told them.
We shouted from the rooftops.
We plead.
We begged.
They didn’t listen.
Now, we all will suffer.